<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dose Rate Range Archives - X-Z LAB</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.x-zlab.com/faq-category/dose-rate-range/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.x-zlab.com/faq-category/dose-rate-range/</link>
	<description>Engineering a Safer World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 19:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why do the devices have a low upper limit on their dose rate range?</title>
		<link>https://www.x-zlab.com/faq/why-do-the-devices-have-a-low-upper-limit-on-their-dose-rate-range/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vickie Chen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 21:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[RadPavise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RadTarge II D700]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.x-zlab.com/?post_type=qa_faqs&#038;p=1601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The dose rate upper limit, 1 mSv/h, is 100 mrem/h when converted to traditional units, which isn&#8217;t too low. A comparable competitor&#8217;s model, Thermo Scientific&#8217;s RadEye PRD, has an upper limit of only 25 mrem/h (250 µSv/h). Our devices&#8217; sensitivity is very high at 340 cps/mrem/h (34 cps/μSv/h) for RadTarge II and RadPavise; as a trade-off, the upper limit on the dose rate cannot be quite as high. The next iteration of these devices, which will be available in October 2015, will have an upper limit of 10 rem/h (100 mSv/h). However, the sensitivity will not be as high as the previous versions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.x-zlab.com/faq/why-do-the-devices-have-a-low-upper-limit-on-their-dose-rate-range/">Why do the devices have a low upper limit on their dose rate range?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.x-zlab.com">X-Z LAB</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dose rate upper limit, 1 mSv/h, is 100 mrem/h when converted to traditional units, which isn&#8217;t too low. A comparable competitor&#8217;s model, Thermo Scientific&#8217;s RadEye PRD, has an upper limit of only 25 mrem/h (250 µSv/h).</p>
<p>Our devices&#8217; sensitivity is very high at 340 cps/mrem/h (34 cps/μSv/h) for RadTarge II and RadPavise; as a trade-off, the upper limit on the dose rate cannot be quite as high.</p>
<p>The next iteration of these devices, which will be available in October 2015, will have an upper limit of 10 rem/h (100 mSv/h). However, the sensitivity will not be as high as the previous versions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.x-zlab.com/faq/why-do-the-devices-have-a-low-upper-limit-on-their-dose-rate-range/">Why do the devices have a low upper limit on their dose rate range?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.x-zlab.com">X-Z LAB</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
